By Mike Cronin
There are many aspects to the tragedy in Orlando that defy reason, but we may yet be able to put many of the chaotic elements into context and derive some small degree of understanding.
Keep in mind the following as you watch the news and listen to the pundits and demagogues:
As we’ve discussed elsewhere, the news networks’ primary job is to sell advertising. They will dwell on every aspect of this story as long as they can in order to keep you coming back to watch commercials find out the latest breaking wrinkle.
The anti-gun fanatics will exploit our fears in order to advance their agenda to ban ___ (take your pick of anything gun or gun-related). They’ll be sure to shout that this was the worst shooting in US history. That might be true if you discount several massacres of Native Americans and the Civil War; I don’t know.
Pro-gun zealots will exploit the fear that the left is coming to take our freedom. They will jump up and down to expose every error the anti-gunners make about the specific gun used, how it was obtained, and about how it is already illegal to have a firearm inside a place that serves alcohol in Florida, so gun bans demonstrably don’t work.
Strident religious groups will be in a hurry to tell us that what happened in Orlando was God’s punishment for the sinful behavior of the club’s clientele. In fact, one such group, ISIS, took credit for the attack!
Let’s try to unscrew ourselves from the ceiling a bit and put some more context to this storm:
Was it the worst mass-shooting in US history? Ever hear of Bear River (~250 dead), Sand Creek (up to 163 dead), or Wounded Knee (150 dead)? They were but three of dozens of massacres of Native Americans committed in the 1800s. How about the various battles of the Civil War (~600,000 dead)? (Granted, some might say those events don’t count because they weren’t “crimes” or terrorist attacks; instead, they were (directly or indirectly) government operations. I think that not only do they count, they exemplify the very reason we must not give up the right to keep and bear arms!)
Was it the worst terrorist attack on US soil? No; that was 9/11. (~3000 dead).
Surely it was the worst domestic terrorist attack? Nope. That dubious title goes to the Oklahoma City bombing. (168 dead)
Nor was Orlando the worst nightclub attack; that distinction belongs to the “Happy Land” club arson fire in the Bronx in 1990 (87 dead).
It does look like Orlando might actually be the worst attack on the LBGT community; though there was an attack nearly as bad in 1973: 32 were killed at the “Upstairs Club” arson attack in New Orleans.
To like-minded folk that believe the second amendment is under attack and should not be infringed upon any further: Yes, the anti-gunners will shamelessly exploit mass shootings. We don’t need to follow their example and squawk and honk at each inaccuracy or inane statement made while the tape is still around the crime scene and the blood is still on the floor. Those rounds are largely wasted. Save them for the letters to the editor and to your politicians. Let the anti-gunners make their mistakes in the heat of the moment.
As for the religious condemnation: If you believe Jesus was the son of God, then ask yourself: what would Jesus do? Would he kill homosexuals? Would he add salt to their wounds after such a tragedy by saying they were killed because they were sinful? Most especially, would he do that just to get attention? If he wouldn’t do those things, it might be wise to follow his example.
If you are a radical Muslim jihadist, I know that nothing I write here will sway you in any way. Even so, I must say it. If you purport to be a devout member of the so-called religion of “peace,” what is peaceful about slaughtering people whose behavior you don’t approve of, either here or in Syria, or Iraq, or the rest of the world where Islam holds sway?
If ISIS was indeed ultimately behind this attack, what have you gained? All you have accomplished is to show your clients and constituents that one jihadi with a gun and a lot of ammo can kill a lot of unarmed people. And….what? Is this supposed to terrify us? We are not terrified. Is it supposed to gain you recruits? You’ve caused just as many, or more, to deplore your cause.
We live in an era with instant news and constant competition for our attention. We are in the middle of one of the most contentious election cycles in recent memory. We are in a shooting conflict with ISIS. The Orlando massacre served as a catalyst to energize a storm of bloviating. We can let it die down a bit so we can hear ourselves think before making hasty conclusions.